Peter Hübner: That is un­der­stand­able. How should it? As long as mod­ern sci­en­tific medi­cine does not get on to the track of the soul with sci­en­tific de­vices: with ob­jec­tive meas­ur­ing meth­ods, un­til then they can­not con­sider it – at least not for any use in medi­cine, which can be cal­cu­lated.

Medizin Aktuell: And some neuro-sci­en­tists bluntly deny the ex­is­tence of a soul and as­sume that hu­man think­ing is only a func­tion of the brain, and the mind not more than some­thing to logi­cally con­clude on the base of think­ing proc­esses – but al­ways only as a con­se­quence and/or de­pen­dent on cor­re­spond­ing brain func­tions.

Peter Hübner: Well, and that is ab­so­lutely cor­rect ac­cord­ing to the pre­sent level of their ob­jec­tive sci­en­tific knowl­edge.

Medizin Aktuell: And now you, as a clas­si­cal com­poser, turn up and talk at an in­ter­na­tional sci­en­tific con­gress in Ha­waii in front of ex­peri­enced and partly fa­mous phy­si­cians, psy­cholo­gists, so­ci­olo­gists, theo­lo­gi­ans, con­scious­ness re­search­ers, bi­olo­gists, physi­cists etc. about the power of the soul in the field of health – as if you had come from an­other planet.
And the strange thing is that your lec­ture was re­garded by these re­spected sci­en­tists from all over the world as the lec­ture at this con­fer­ence, which moved them most of all.

If I did not know that the par­tici­pants at this con­fer­ence were mainly top-flight sci­en­tists, then I could only have as­sumed un­til now that such high rec­og­ni­tion of your lec­ture origi­nated from mainly phi­loso­phi­cal and spiri­tual cir­cles. How do you ex­plain this?

Peter Hübner: With­out doubt Prof. Paul Rosch, as the President of the Ameri­can In­sti­tute of Stress, had in­vited im­por­tant sci­en­tists to this con­fer­ence – those, who are not only rela­tively su­per­fi­cial sci­en­tists, but – like all im­por­tant sci­en­tists of the past and pre­sent – have a cor­re­spond­ingly strong in­ter­est in the arts sub­jects, which then al­ways ex­tends into the field of the spiri­tual – with­out ac­tu­ally los­ing grip of the sci­en­tific side, and there­fore slip­ping into what we to­day, even if from a his­toric point of view mis­takenly, call “eso­teric arts”.

In bla­tant cases, even take such great sci­en­tists as Pythagoras, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Einstein, Max Planck – the num­ber of names could go on and on – all these great sci­en­tists at the same time strived to achieve sci­en­tific find­ings in the arts sub­jects, in or­der to get an­swers from where natu­ral sci­ence did not have them.
They were all dying to know what – as they say – “keeps the world to­gether deep down inside”.

And here I am ab­so­lutely right with the soul in my opin­ion.
Thus, the sci­en­tifi­cally rele­vant an­swer to the sig­nifi­cance of the soul pos­si­bly arises from the field of medi­cine – I mean: sci­en­tific medi­cine.

We are there­fore try­ing to fa­cili­tate or at least to pro­mote the find­ing of an ob­jec­tive sci­en­tific an­swer to the ques­tion “What keeps the world to­gether deep down inside!” with Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic^® and/or the help of the har­mony laws of the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic.